<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unified Concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com</link>
	<description>Unified Communications solution provider specializing in all aspects of Unified communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco releases the new Nexus 7009</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/cisco-releases-the-new-nexus-7009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/cisco-releases-the-new-nexus-7009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Lemmy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What initially appears to be a great addition the 7009 fits nice as a campus core switch. The 14 RU chassis is a good deal smaller than the 21 RU Nexus 7010. If you are stuck with the need for front to back cooling than this is probably not the right switch for you. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What initially appears to be a great addition the 7009 fits nice as a campus core switch. The 14 RU chassis is a good deal smaller than the 21 RU Nexus 7010. If you are stuck with the need for front to back cooling than this is probably not the right switch for you. The cooling of the new 7009 is side to side which may cause problems if you do not have the clearance to keep the air moving.</p>
<p>What makes this amazing is the new F2 card this new switch supports. 48 SFP+ interfaces that can handle 1 gig or 10 gig on every port. The card will also take copper gbic&#8217;s and supports layer 2 and layer 3. The only catch here is if you want this card to work with the M1 or F1 cards it will need to run on a separate VDC. Doing this creates a much more complicated scenario. It also requires an expensive license from Cisco to enable the feature.</p>
<p>To summarize</p>
<p>If you are starting from scratch and need the flexibility of copper or fiber then this is the way to go. Its a great way to start migrating your network over to 10 gig as well. Once the core is in you can swap out the 1 gig gbics for 10 gig gbics as you upgrade your edge switches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/cisco-releases-the-new-nexus-7009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco User Connect Licensing Is In… DLU’s are almost Out!</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/cisco-user-connect-licensing-is-in%e2%80%a6-dlu%e2%80%99s-are-almost-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/cisco-user-connect-licensing-is-in%e2%80%a6-dlu%e2%80%99s-are-almost-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Lemmy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco licensing is changing with the introduction of V8 and VMWare.  First and foremost, Device Licenses or DLU licensing will be obsolete.  However, Cisco will still keep their CUWL (Cisco Unified Workspace License) licensing but, as many of us have found out, CUWL is just not cost effective.  Purchasing CUWL licensing is similar to purchasing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco licensing is changing with the introduction of V8 and VMWare.  First and foremost, Device Licenses or DLU licensing will be obsolete.  However, Cisco will still keep their CUWL (Cisco Unified Workspace License) licensing but, as many of us have found out, CUWL is just not cost effective.  Purchasing CUWL licensing is similar to purchasing Microsoft Office in the sense that you receive a surplus of unneeded applications when purchasing the software bundle. CUWL can be nice if it fits but that is not always the case.</p>
<p>While Cisco may be keeping their CUWL licensing, they have introduced a more user based licensing solution to replace the DLU model in their introduction of User Connect Licensing or UCL.  UCL is an A La Carte menu for application licenses that offers a new license model that, aside from the exclusion of CER and a few other application licenses, is nearly 100% user based.    Furthermore, all customers moving up from a version 7 or prior will be converted to UCL unless you pay the upgrade for CUWL or already own it.</p>
<p>The foundation of User Connect Licensing starts out with the choice of two primary licenses.  The first option is a basic license that is pretty much useless. The only two phones it supports do not even include a display.  Furthermore, UCL is user based and licensing is purchased individually for every feature.  For example, assume every user will need an enhanced license for call control, then the same train of thought can be applied to a voicemail license or any other added featured in your system. </p>
<p>Consequently, UCSS and ESW are handled in the exact same manner of being user based with additional features being charged individually.  Cisco has made clear as long as a customer has active UCSS when they move from the old licensing model, they will be converted to the new UCL model at no cost to the end user.</p>
<p>Just a few of the huge Positives gained by this new model:</p>
<ul>
<li>Easier and more cost effective to deploy new applications</li>
<li>A low user count that needs a specific application will have a more relative cost</li>
<li>Added ability to customize licensing for public space area’s conferencing etc.</li>
</ul>
<p>Unified Concepts has performed this analysis numerous times for our customers and has consistently substantiated the benefits in implementing Cisco’s UCS and UCL model.  However, the one glaring negative we have seen is the cost increase in Essential Software Warranty (ESW) specifically for call control.  Fortunately the increase in ESW cost applies only for call control while the rest of the UCSS and ESW costs for all other parts of the solution remain unaffected Furthermore, it should be noted that with the elimination of MCS servers and its associated cost reduction, the inflated ESW cost for call control ultimately cancels itself out. </p>
<p>Overall, Unified Concepts believes the arrival of UCS and User Connect Licensing is a great change from Cisco.  Cisco is providing a revolutionary solution to simplifying a once complicated world of licensing and provisioning.  Of course, Unified Concepts not only recognizes the importance to understanding all the nuances when making this jump, we also believe it is extremely advantageous to execute a well planned transition to Cisco’s UCS and UCL solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/cisco-user-connect-licensing-is-in%e2%80%a6-dlu%e2%80%99s-are-almost-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3… 2… 1… Cisco has launched their branded UCS servers and our reviews are in!</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/3%e2%80%a6-2%e2%80%a6-1%e2%80%a6-cisco-has-launched-their-branded-ucs-servers-and-our-reviews-are-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/3%e2%80%a6-2%e2%80%a6-1%e2%80%a6-cisco-has-launched-their-branded-ucs-servers-and-our-reviews-are-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Lemmy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco has recently introduced some significant changes in their Cisco Unified Communication products that will have a substantial affect on their Unified Communications customers.  The changes in version 8 and forward will present some huge benefits but, as always, there will also be some negative side effects to Cisco’s implementation of new products. The most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco has recently introduced some significant changes in their Cisco Unified Communication products that will have a substantial affect on their Unified Communications customers.  The changes in version 8 and forward will present some huge benefits but, as always, there will also be some negative side effects to Cisco’s implementation of new products.</p>
<p>The most prominent and evident change to be noted is UCS <em>(Unified Computing Systems) </em>and the introduction of<em> </em>Cisco in the server market.  Cisco has launched Cisco branded UCS servers making the previously required MCS series HP or IBM servers unnecessary in the UC solution.  Additionally, if you purchase a Cisco UCS server along with VMware 4, you can now “officially” run most of your UC applications in a virtual environment and consequently eliminate your inventory of MCS servers from your data center. </p>
<p>The positives you get from Cisco’s new UCS solution are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Consolidation</li>
<li>Redundancy</li>
<li>Faster deployment</li>
<li>Less Smartnet on the servers</li>
<li>Lower power and cooling usage</li>
</ul>
<p>There are specific OVA (VMWare) templates for most of the supported UC applications.  The only negative in the way Cisco works with VMWare is the way in which resources are assigned application wise—meaning the specified amount of cores and required user or device count are directly correlated with one another.  Additionally, the same reassignment of resources is applied to the allocation of memory.  You also are not able to run any other (NON Cisco) applications on the Cisco VMware server either. There is a maximum of four Cisco apps per server.</p>
<p>Although this may not be a 100% ideal scenario it is still a great step in the right direction. Cisco has also been running some amazing specials on their servers as well. This is probably an attempt to push hard into a market they were not part of until recently. If you are in need of upgrading your Cisco Unified Communications including Call Manager and Unity this is definitely the direction you want to look at. Right now Cisco UCS will not only save you money but it will be a better overall solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/3%e2%80%a6-2%e2%80%a6-1%e2%80%a6-cisco-has-launched-their-branded-ucs-servers-and-our-reviews-are-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>home-image2</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/home-image2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/home-image2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 06:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[home image link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?page_id=435"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16" title="16" src="http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/16.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="173" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/home-image2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>home-image1</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/home-image1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/home-image1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 06:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[home image link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?page_id=495"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-15" title="12" src="http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/12.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="173" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/home-image1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lorem passage</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/lorem-passage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/lorem-passage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean at est vitae ipsum ultricies luctus id in lacus. Etiam elementum dui mi, nec iaculis lectus. Maecenas ante leo, rhoncus ultricies sodales sed, aliquet in leo. Integer varius urna eu est blandit in dignissim odio dapibus. Nullam ornare placerat nisl, vestibulum convallis nisl cursus non. Nulla [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean at est vitae ipsum ultricies luctus id in lacus. Etiam elementum dui mi, nec iaculis lectus. Maecenas ante leo, rhoncus ultricies sodales sed, aliquet in leo. Integer varius urna eu est blandit in dignissim odio dapibus. Nullam ornare placerat nisl, vestibulum convallis nisl cursus non. Nulla gravida commodo semper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/lorem-passage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contact information</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/contact-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/contact-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1S280 Summit Ave. Suite A2 Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 630-916-4600 Main 630-916-4646 Fax Info@UnifiedConcepts.com Support@UnifiedConcepts.com Jobs@UnifiedConcepts.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1S280 Summit Ave. Suite A2</p>
<p>Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181</p>
<p>630-916-4600 Main</p>
<p>630-916-4646 Fax</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Info@UnifiedConcepts.com">Info@UnifiedConcepts.com</a><br />
<a href="mailto:support@UnifiedConcepts.com">Support@UnifiedConcepts.com</a><br />
<a href="mailto:jobs@UnifiedConcepts.com">Jobs@UnifiedConcepts.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/contact-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it better to roll out an entire new Unified Communications system all at once or make the changes gradually?</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/is-it-better-to-roll-out-an-entire-new-unified-communications-system-all-at-once-or-make-the-changes-gradually/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/is-it-better-to-roll-out-an-entire-new-unified-communications-system-all-at-once-or-make-the-changes-gradually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both approaches will work but most organizations take advantage of the modular nature of Unified Communications and implement gradually. With that being said… it is crucial that you do your research and develop a comprehensive architectural plan of what your Unified Communications Infrastructure will look like. Remember: include a thorough time line to keep the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both approaches will work but most organizations take advantage of the modular nature of Unified Communications and implement gradually.  With that being said… it is crucial that you  do your research and develop a comprehensive architectural plan of what  your <strong>Unified Communications</strong> Infrastructure will look like. Remember: include a thorough time line to keep the project moving forward.</p>
<div>Ultimately, moving forward blindly could be costly. If you haven&#8217;t designed, implemented, or managed a <strong>Unified Communications Infrastructure &#8211; think about outsourcing to professionals that have expertise in Unified Communications</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/is-it-better-to-roll-out-an-entire-new-unified-communications-system-all-at-once-or-make-the-changes-gradually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My internal staff has already determined there are no savings why would I need you?</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/my-internal-staff-has-already-determined-there-are-no-savings-why-would-i-need-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/my-internal-staff-has-already-determined-there-are-no-savings-why-would-i-need-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/wp/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a thing we hear regularly. Most of the business cases we develop are for customers that believe this. This mainly happens because internal staff do not understand the nuances of implimenting a cetralized solution like we do. When we put together a business case we look at many different area&#8217;s to cut costs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a thing we hear regularly.</p>
<p>Most of the business cases we develop are for customers that believe  this. This mainly happens because internal staff do not understand the  nuances of implimenting a cetralized solution like we do. When we put  together a business case we look at many different area&#8217;s to cut costs.  What is the worst case scanario? We confirm there are no tangible cost  savings for your organization? That is something that rarely happens and  for the small investment in time on your part why not find out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/my-internal-staff-has-already-determined-there-are-no-savings-why-would-i-need-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello world!</title>
		<link>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/unifiedconcepts/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.unifiedconcepts.com/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

